Rovingpatrol's Blog

Bush Didn’t Do These Things

Posted in politics by roving on April 27, 2010

We are almost a year and half into the Obama dictatorship and Obama, along with the media and the democrats still blame Bush for all of Obama’s   failures.

Bush didn’t:

Cause the bank failures

High unemployment

Apologize to the world for America

Bow down to our enemies.

Disrespect our friends

Attend a racists church

Hang out with a murderer and terrorists.

Attend a Jew bashing party

Insult handicapped people

Make fun of people who have religion and are gun owners

Take over American companies

Having a goal of  running Insurance companies out of business

Speak to everyone but whites to help his party to hold onto power come Nov.

Put the United States trillions into debt

Make the United States weaker

Get our soldiers killed with new rules of engagement

Say he wouldn’t raise our taxes but do it anyway

Say he wants to bankrupt coal companies

Wants our electricity and all energy prices to skyrocket

Have the media continually cover for him

Take as many vacations

Receive praise from dictators for being like them

Fire CEO’s of American companies

Treating Israel as the enemy

Used the dead soldiers  coming home as a photo-op

Would allow his brother to live in a hut surviving on $12 a year

Think rich people are evil even though he himself is one of the rich ones.

Take over almost 50% of our economy

Have pictures of himself plastered all over the White House

Stand there with his head cocked up looking down at everyone

Used a teleprompter for simple meetings

Lack of news conferences (9 months and counting)

Take his podium everywhere

Hide every single document about his past

Purposely ruin the economy

Turned the White House into party central

Receive millions of dollars from mysterious overseas donors

Teach other community organizers on how to intimidate others

Take credit for others work

Wanted  it to be a crime to defend yourself with a gun against a home intruder

Obama did these things.

Advertisements

Democrats. The Party Of Yes

Posted in politics by roving on November 7, 2009

Democrats have been falsely calling the Republicans the party of no. We all know the reason the Republicans are saying no to the Government take over of our lives. Well I call the Democrats the party of yes.

Raise taxes on the poor. YES

Vote to raise just about any tax that comes before them. YES

Ignore the Constitution. YES

Take one persons money  away to give to others who refuse to work. YES

Take away freedom of speech. YES

Make excuses for minorities involved in crimes. YES

Make it a hate crime if minorities are beat up but not when it happens to whites. YES

Against civil rights. YES (Continually voted against civil rights)

Against self protection. YES (Obama himself while in the Senate wanted it to be a crime to use a gun in your own home when protecting yourself)

Ban legal gun ownership. YES

Take  money meant for the military and use for their own pet projects. YES

Weaken the military. YES

Dems don’t have to pay taxes until caught, then not punished. YES

Put the tax cheats in power. YES

Take over private business. YES

Tell CEO’s of private companies what they can earn. YES

Throw people in prison for not buying health care. YES

Force laws on the people but not on themselves. YES

Tax everything we can think of. YES

Make laws to take away freedoms. YES

We know better then you. YES

Punish the people for using sugar and fats. YES

Lie lie and lie some more. YES

Kill babies but not killers. YES

Take illegal campaign contributions. YES

Only hold Republicans up to ethical conduct. YES

Force only Republicans to produce medical records, college records, Senate records, passport records, BIRTH CERTIFICATES, ets. YES

 

 

Media Covers Up Another Obama Crime

Posted in politics by roving on May 27, 2009

When will the media or the justice department do their job instead of yucking it up at press conferences?

Its being reported all over the web how most dealerships being shut down are the ones that had contributed to the republicans. A little Chicago style payback happening here. Yet, its not being reported on any news network. Any wonder why the print and televised news is failing? Lucky for them sheeple don’t do much research on their own or they all would be completely shut down for lack of customers.

Just one of the many stories…

Newsmax Increasing numbers of Chrysler dealers are disputing the bankrupt automaker’s claim that it selected dealerships for closure on purely economic grounds, and they have filed a suit against the automaker in U.S. bankruptcy court.

“My business is being stolen from me under the guise of the bankruptcy laws [and] given to another dealer down the street,” Jim Anderer, owner of Island Jeep in Lindenhurst, N.Y., told Reuters.

Like many of the 789 Chrysler dealerships slated for closure, Anderer claims his retail outlet was profitable.

Many of the closed dealers were also major donors to Republican candidates and political action committees, a review of campaign finance data from the Federal Election Commission shows.

One company that stands to benefit in a major way from the Chrysler restructuring is called RLJ-McLarty-Landers, a start-up owned by Democratic Party insiders that operates six Chrysler dealerships throughout the South.

Co-owners Robert L. Johnson, founder of Black Entertainment Television, and Mack McLarty, chief of staff to president Bill Clinton, provided capital and political clout to the partnership, which they formed in September 2007.


“There Is No Pork In This Bill”

Posted in politics by roving on February 26, 2009

This is what Obama has said a few times. Just one of many many lies Obama has uttered since his career in office. We all have an Obama in our life. Be it at work or someone we know. We listen to them while nodding our heads or goad them on into telling even bigger whoppers. Then as soon as they leave the room, we make fun of him or compare the biggest lie the person has told.

Some of what is not pork that is in the recovery package via America’s Right

  • $59 million for Pacific salmon research
  • $5.8 million earmark for the “Ted Kennedy Institute for the Senate . . . for the planning and design of a building & an endowment”
  • $5.02 million for salaries at the Sugarbeet Disease and Oncology Labs (from Sen. Carl Levin)
  • $2.19 million for the Center for Grape Genetics (from Sen. Chuck Schumer)
  • $2 million for the promotion of astronomy in Hawaii
  • $1.79 million for swine odor and manure management
  • $1.76 million for a honeybee laboratory (from Texas Rep. Chet Edwards)
  • $1.04 million for fighting troublesome crickets in Utah
  • $819,000 for Catfish Genome Mapping (from Alabama Republican Richard Shelby), much of which could end up at my Alma Mater
  • $500,000 for a Senate “pilot program” designed to better make use of mass-mailing postcards
  • $500,000 for a fruit fly facility in Hawaii
  • $473,000 for the National Council of La Raza (from Sens. Bingaman and Menendez)
  • $400,000 for educator training designed to curb bullying at schools
  • $331,000 for research in shellfish technologies (from Virginia Sen. Jim Webb)
  • $254,000 for the Montana Sheep Institute
  • $238,000 for education programs at the Polynesian Voyaging Society
  • $209,000 for improvement of blueberry production and efficience (from Georgia Republican Saxby Chambliss)
  • $200,000 for a “Tattoo Removal Violence Prevention Outreach Program”
  • $190,000 for the Buffalo Bill Historical Center
  • $162,000 for rodent control in Hawaii
  • $143,000 for the expansion of natural history programs at a Las Vegas history museum (from Sen. Harry Reid)
Tagged with: , , ,

The Cover-Ups Will Now Commence

Posted in politics by roving on February 22, 2009

What is it we are told over and over? Never sign something with out reading it first and if you don’t understand anything, ask.

I would think something as big as bankrupting our country would be worthy of a read over before voting. Obama is a habitual liar. Everyone knows this. It astounds me that they voted on this piece of crap stimulus bill  without knowing what was all in it.

It will take some time but  what is in the package is starting to filter out. Who knows how long it will take before it all is understood. Obama may have just found a way to keep his past and future crimes hidden and it has nothing to do with creating jobs.

I would like to meet the people who actually vote for Pelosi and Reed and ask them if they are insane or what. Surely they must be brain damaged. Maybe they could explain to me how they think the two give a crap about them or this country.

The far-reaching — and potentially dangerous — provision that no one knows about.

The provision, which attracted virtually no attention in the debate over the 1,073-page stimulus bill, creates something called the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board — the RAT Board, as it’s known by the few insiders who are aware of it. The board would oversee the in-house watchdogs, known as inspectors general, whose job is to independently investigate allegations of wrongdoing at various federal agencies, without fear of interference by political appointees or the White House.

In the name of accountability and transparency, Congress has given the RAT Board the authority to ask “that an inspector general conduct or refrain from conducting an audit or investigation.” If the inspector general doesn’t want to follow the wishes of the RAT Board, he’ll have to write a report explaining his decision to the board, as well as to the head of his agency (from whom he is supposedly independent) and to Congress. In the end, a determined inspector general can probably get his way, but only after jumping through bureaucratic hoops that will inevitably make him hesitate to go forward.

Chief political correspondent Byron York inquired with the office of a Democratic senator, one who is a big fan of inspectors general, I was told the RAT Board was “something the Obama administration wanted included in this bill.”

Read  the full story at dcexaminer

Tagged with: , , ,

Roland Burris, A Gift From God

Posted in politics by roving on February 21, 2009

Burris must of been listening  to some other God. . “People said I was either crazy or divinely directed. I accept the latter,” he said. “I believe without a doubt that I am predestined to be a role model.”

The  man Roland Burris who said the bible is his blueprint for life,  knowingly tried sending an innocent man to death row. In a perfect world Burris would have been brought up on attempted murder charges.

Sun-Times In 1992, as Burris sought the death penalty for Cruz — who had been convicted twice by juries — a Burris deputy resigned in protest. Deputy Attorney General Mary Brigid Kenney became convinced that Cruz was innocent, the victim of “many instances of prosecutorial misconduct.” She asked Burris to stop defending the case before the Supreme Court but Burris refused. In her letter of resignation, Kenney claimed her boss had “seen fit to ignore the evidence in this case.” Burris countered that “it is not for me to place my judgment over a jury, regardless of what I think.” The state Supreme Court eventually tossed out the conviction and a DNA test in 1995 matched a different man, Brian Dugan, to the crime.

And now we have Burris trying to buy the senate seat. Obama wants Burris out now. Of course he does. Obama got the vote he wanted. Isn’t it funny how everyone around Obama has committed crimes except for Obama. Sooner or later Obama is going to throw the wrong person under the bus and they are going to squeal long and loud.

Is it just me or does Obama being in power for one month feel like its been years? I am so ready for change.

Tagged with: , ,

More Proof Fitzgerald Is Protecting Obama

Posted in politics by roving on February 19, 2009

I would like to know why it took till AFTER the vote on the bankrupt America deal before it came to light Burris lied about not having any contact with anyone having something to do with Blagoojevich and selling of senate seats.

Obama needed Burris badly  to vote on the bill. Obama wanted Burris to have the senate seat. Obama of course will act dumb again and say he was out of the loop and had no idea.  What does anyone want to bet some knew Burris lied but kept quiet until after the vote. If so, then anyone hiding the information should also be prosecuted. Oh wait. Burris is a democrat. It was a bone head mistake. He just forgot to mention he tried raising money for Blago. Being a democrat that’s allowable. They also don’t have to pay taxes unless caught and when caught have nothing happen to them. Use the Obama defense. Works for him.

Fitzgerald had Burris on tape yet, after Burris lied in the impeachment hearing, Fitz stayed silent. He let a crime be committed. Just another reason people shouldn’t put their hopes on Fitz bringing Obama down. Fitz has had other chances to get Obama and let it go. I suspect he stopped the investigation into the selling of the senate seat to protect Obama. What we need is a special investigator to investigate Fitz.

What is it about Obama that has everyone so scared of him? The MSM is sitting on the biggest story of the century about  Obama’s birth certificate and how he is fighting the release of it. They all know about it but refuse to report it or do their own investigation.

NOW Democrats call for Burris to resign. Only because they have to. I wonder if they would have called for his resignation  before the vote? Unlikely.

Does This Guy EVER Tell The Truth?

Posted in politics by roving on February 14, 2009

The Three GOP Possible Forced Sellouts

Posted in politics by roving on February 14, 2009

Why did the three Republicans vote in favor of the pork bill even after being swamped by calls and email to vote against it? That is what I would like someone to look into.

Did Obama’s people go through the past of some Republicans and pick the three most vulnerable because of something in their past and forced them to go along?

Could it be they were bribed to vote in favor of the pork bill? Republicans who crossed party lines apparently got rewarded. The New York Times reported Thursday that Specter got $6.5 billion for medical research. The senator is ailing from cancer. Funny how millionaires never care about a illness until they themselves come down with it.

The three traitors knew they would be committing political suicide voting for the pork bill but when ahead and did it anyway.  Specter looked like a idiot trying to defend his reasoning defending the pork bill on Fox News.  Maybe his was for selfish reasons. Hoping to find a cure for himself.

The “gang of three” — liberal Republican Sens. Arlen Specter, Olympia Snowe, and Susan Collins — who handed President Obama the stimulus bill he so desperately needed, apparently sacrificed billions in tax cuts during final negotiations over the measure in order to reduce its cost. Now why would a Republican be  against tax cuts? It goes against the way Republicans think.

“From auto dealers to the home-building industry, big business appears to be the biggest loser in the final economic stimulus plan . . .” The Wall Street Journal online reported, noting that Democrats removed key tax cuts and benefits for business as political payback for Republicans who failed to support the plan.

What is it going to take before the Democrats wake up and see the light?

I would like to see someone dig into the past of the three and find out what was bad enough to force them to go along with the Democrats. For now I want them stripped off their Republican affiliation.

Why Arrest Blagojevich But Not Obama?

Posted in politics by roving on January 5, 2009

handcuffs Mr. Ryskamp had written and mailed this letter to Fitzgerald last month:

Dear Mr. Fitzgerald:

Today you told the press, in connection with the Blagojevich arrest, “We were in the middle of a corruption crime spree and we wanted to stop it.” And yet most of the complaint is based on evidence you have had for a number of years. In other words, if the matter concerning the appointment of a Senator were removed, you would still have had enough evidence to indict Blagojevich. In fact, the complaint shows that you have enough evidence for a number of years.

This means that you and no one else, allowed Blagojevich to continue on a “crime spree” long after you had enough evidence to arrest him. Indeed, he would never have gotten to the point at which he was about to sell a Senate seat, if you had arrested him earlier. Why did you not do so? Why did you allow him to commit more crimes?

And now you are about to show the same negligence again. You are apparently about to make the same mistake with regard to Barack Obama. As you probably know, Evelyn Pringle has published detailed online articles concerning Obama’s participation in “Operation Board Games” crimes. Below, I reproduce paragraphs from your own Blagojevich complaint, and after them, a section from the Pringle Obama articles dealing with precisely the same facts as the complaint.

Her articles show in detail that Obama has committed the same 18 USC 1346 crimes you discuss in your Blagojevich complaint. And yet he has not yet been arrested. Why not?

Just as you allowed Blagojevich to get to the point where he was about to sell a United States Senate seat, so you allowed Obama to be elected President, and apparently you are willing to let him continue his own crime spree by actually becoming President.

It was irresponsible for you to continue to allow Blagojevich to continue in office when you had enough evidence to arrest him, and it is irresponsible of you now to allow Obama to continue in office and become President, when you have enough evidence to arrest him.

Arrest Obama now. It is irresponsible of you to wait any longer.

Sincerely yours,

John Ryskamp

This letter writer is talking about investigative reporter Evelyn Pringle story she posted online: “The investigation dubbed “Operation Board Games,” into the influence peddling within the cesspool of corruption that encompasses Illinois politicians from both major parties, has developed into multiple subplots, many of which feature Barack Obama.” The rest is here.

So why is it Obama is still walking around free?

To top it off, its being reported Obama received $10,000 from Raghuveer Nayak for his 2004 senate primary run. Which is ILLEGAL.  The federal investigators are looking to see if Rahuveer sought to raise 1 million dollars for Blagojevich in exchange for the governor’s appointing of Mr. Jackson to the senate seat.

Okay, find and dandy but what about the $10,000 Obama received? What about the millions of illegal dollars from overseas donors to his campaign? Why is Obama continually getting a free pass? I think we are in for one of most corrupt presidencies ever.

How Was Obama Nominated To US Senate?

Posted in politics by roving on December 28, 2008

Obama condemned the US supreme court for ruling upholding a ban on a partial  birth abortions.  But how did Obama vote back in 1997 when he was new and had a chance to stand against similar statewide bans? Present.

Obama has voted present 130 times. He did this is because he was looking ahead into the future. It was clear to many he had no plans of staying.  Obama approached then-Senate Democratic Chief of Staff Mike Hoffman about his appeal to downstate voters. Hoffen told him “if you have a strange name, you could have some fun with it.” Sound familiar?

Obama needed a powerful friend and he found that friend in Emil Jones. They had met years before when Obama was a “community organizer”

It wasn’t long before Emil Jones gave assignments normally more senior lawmakers would do. Some lawmakers didn’t like  Jones seemly giving Obama so much attention. It caused some rift.

When Hendon became angry at Obama for “mistakenly” voting the wrong way they almost came to blows. With the microphones off the two walked away and when Obama tried to put his hand on Hendon’s shoulder, Hendon slapped it away.

Asked about the incident, Hendon said, “My memory is foggy on that issue. It’s going to remain foggy.”

Obama was ready to move up. He went to Jones…

“You’re a very powerful guy,” Obama told Jones.

“I’ve got the power to do what?” Jones responded.

“You could help elect a U.S. senator,” Obama said.

Jones asked his protege if he had anyone in mind.

“Yeah,” Obama replied. “Me.”

He couldn’t count on the support of some prominent Black Caucus members, including Hendon. In a interview, he said Obama was so ambitious that if the position were up for a vote, Obama would run for “king of the world.”

Obama formally announced his campaign in January 2003, more than a year ahead of the primary. Jones, of course, was there. Link, Walsh and Jacobs also attended, illustrating that his support transcended the black community.

Hendon and Trotter were a tougher sell. Jones eventually got them to endorse Obama. Hendon said it took “seven or eight” talks with Jones before he finally decided to go along. And, Hendon said, he only did it out of loyalty to Jones.

Obama wasn’t expecting the endorsement of either Trotter or Hendon. He asked Jones how he pulled it off.

“I made them an offer,” Jones recalled telling Obama. “And you don’t want to know.

We know what happen after that. He got everyone else kicked off the ballet then filed court papers trying to get his opponent (who was ahead in the polls) divorce papers unsealed. After he dropped out, it was a straight shot to the US senate.

I would love to know what this offer was that Jones told Obama he wouldn’t want to know about.  I also wonder who is behind Obama pulling the strings. Why is Obama appointing so many people from the Clinton administration? Do the Clinton’s have something on Obama? Why is Obama bringing in people from Chicago? Who does Obama owe in Chicago?

Now instead of keeping the most dirty corrupt politicians in the whole country  in IL, Chicago politics is moving to Washington to spread the virus. Expect fours years of cover-ups, investigations, maybe an accidental death and or “suicides”  here and there.
us_born_died