Rovingpatrol's Blog

Linda Starr Posts New Information

Posted in politics by roving on January 20, 2009

Posted Jan 19 from Obamacrimes:

how many of you picked up on what Phil said on tonight’s radio show about the FOIA confirming Barry never had an American passport under the name of Barack Obama until hsi diplomatic passport issued as a US Senator? Do you understand and comprehend the enormity of that announcement? Do you all realize what it means? I can tell you now that is one part of several pieces of good news we had the other day that I hinted at and could not reveal. That information confirms Barry had to renew an Indonesian passport to go to Pakistan in 81. That means Barry swore an Oath of Allegiance to Indonesia and had to renounce all other allegiances to get that passport. This is independent confirmation of information we’ve had and from OUR OWN State Department, Barry couldn’t go to Pakistan on an American passport if he didn’t have one.

There are so many amazing pieces of good news coming in. I wish I could tell you all about it. I will say this, I am skeptical of the announcement Barry will be served with papers to block his swearing in tomorrow, but it’s not inconceivable in light of other information I have heard today. Again, I have no way to verify anything except that which we have obtained certified documents.

I may have some very interesting information for everyone tomorrow. Tune in. Hehehe

My question is if Berg has this information, why hasn’t he done anything with it? Or has he?


12 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Dr. Conspiracy said, on January 20, 2009 at 9:16 pm

    The US travel ban to Pakistan in 1981 is an urban legend.

    Proof: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F0DE2DA1338F937A25755C0A967948260&sec=travel&spon=&pagewanted=5

  2. Kathleen said, on January 20, 2009 at 10:34 pm

    Dr. Conspiracy, your link didn’t prove anything. Get a link up in the 1980’s time period from the State Dept on travel to Pakistan, and then maybe you’ll have something. Not that it’d matter anyway if it is proved BO traveled on his Indonesian passport to Pakistan.

  3. Dr. Conspiracy said, on January 20, 2009 at 10:44 pm

    No, no, Kathleen. You don’t get off that easy. I provided proof, a contemporary newspaper account by an American reporter (one of two articles by the way) who personally traveled to Pakistan in 1981 as an American and got a Visa at the border, proof enough for any reasonable person that Americans could travel to Pakistan in 1981.

    Now the burden of proof is on you to show why anyone should believe the travel ban ever existed. If you think you’re right, give me some evidence. I did my job already.

  4. Dr. Facts said, on January 20, 2009 at 11:33 pm

    Dr. Conspiracy you are missing the point. It does not matter if there was ever a travel ban. It has been confirmed that Obama NEVER HAD A U.S. PASSPORT IN HIS NAME UNTIL HE WAS A U.S. SENATOR. Now where else could he have gotten a passport to travel to Pakistan? I bet that Indonesia lets their citizens have passports.

  5. Ted said, on January 21, 2009 at 12:33 am

    Q&A:

    Who was the 44th President of the USA?

    ANSWER:

    Joe Biden.

    He was the Acting President for at least 5 minutes under either the Constitution’s Article 2 or the Constitution’s 20th Amendment, from 12:00 Noon 1/20/09, having already taken his Oath of Office and before Obama completed his ‘oath’ at approximately 12:05 PM, 1/20/09. Under the 20th Amendment if the President-elect shall have failed to qualify, or alternatively under Article 2 if the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term, being 12:00 Noon 1/20/09, which ability and/or qualification includes that he take the Article 2 oath “before he enter on the execution of his office,” then either the Presidency shall devolve on the Vice President under Article 2 or the Vice President shall act as President under the 20th Amendment.

    Here’s why this may be significant. If a subsequent Supreme Court ruling disqualifies Obama as not being an Article 2 “natural born citizen”, Biden’s automatic succession to the Presidency could be predicated upon either and/or both having been Vice President under Article 2 or, if that be deemed problematic because Obama’s unlawful Presidency is nullified, Vice President-elect under the 20th Amendment.

  6. Brian H said, on January 21, 2009 at 1:04 am

    I’ll take door number 2, on the provision that a caretaker Administration is named, not headed by Pelosi etc. GWB for 6 more months, with new voting in April, please.

  7. roving said, on January 21, 2009 at 11:38 am

    Like Dr. Facts said. It makes no difference if there was a ban or not. Read what she said. Obama never had a US passport to begin with.

  8. […] This act of national treachery and international atrocity by “President” Obama is now done. Today, by executive order, our money is now being confiscated by federal tax and used to promote the killing of infants in the womb, throughout the world. Global socialist and eugenicist abortion pushers hide behind the fallacious “health of the mother” excuse, in citing this move as favorable to human rights, though it is all about killing humans. That posture is deceit, since discussing surgical assistance for mothers in jeopardy was never denied by the Mexico City protocol, now reversed by Obama (last known evidentiary name: Soetoro). […]

  9. […] “independent confirmation of information we’ve had and from OUR OWN State Department” reported to have been said by Berg’s assistant Linda […]

  10. Dr. Conspiracy said, on January 26, 2009 at 10:55 pm

    Dr. Facts says “It does not matter if there was ever a travel ban. It has been confirmed that Obama NEVER HAD A U.S. PASSPORT IN HIS NAME UNTIL HE WAS A U.S. SENATOR. Now where else could he have gotten a passport to travel to Pakistan? I bet that Indonesia lets their citizens have passports.”

    Well it matters to me that people are making up fake travel bans and posting them on 20,000 web pages (Google search). It makes one question exactly what else they are making up, like “confirmed that Obama NEVER HAD A U.S. PASSPORT IN HIS NAME UNTIL HE WAS A U.S. SENATOR.” I’ve never seen any evidence of that, and I get around a lot.

    An Indonesian passport is impossible. Indonesian law doesn’t allow dual citizenship, and the fact that US law prevented Obama from renouncing his US citizenship while a child, makes Indonesian citizenship not an option. Here is the relevant Indonesian naturalization law:

    http://www.expat.or.id/info/revisiontocitizenshiplaw.html

  11. Brutal Truth Wins said, on February 7, 2009 at 11:19 pm

    “It has been confirmed that Obama NEVER HAD A U.S. PASSPORT IN HIS NAME UNTIL HE WAS A U.S. SENATOR.”

    That is not confirmed. Berg lied, again. You can’t FOIA about Obama’s passport. That’s why Berg showed no evidence of his FOIA.

    Supreme Court said so in 1982
    Department of State v. Washington Post Co., 456 U.S. 595

    http://supreme.justia.com/us/456/595/case.html

  12. paul said, on February 3, 2010 at 3:03 am

    Ok, enough argued here…. How about his application for financial aid.. oh wait… in his own hand writing his nationality is Indonesian. And yes during the time he was in school in Indonesia only Indonesian citizens were allowed to be educated…. and through all of these arguments we are missing the simple truth… A birth certificate from Hawaii $25, legal defense of citizenship thus far more than $950,000 simple logic priceless!

    And remember McCain was challenged by a Congressional commission on his NATURAL BORN CITIZENSHIP simply produced his birth certificate…. LOGIC why spend $950,000 in legal defense when $25 would produce a birth certificate?

    It is walking like a duck, quacking and smelling…. tell me who is going to say that emperor is not wearing clothes? OH wait there are some putting their reputations on the line. Let’s argue some logic here.


Leave a comment