Rovingpatrol's Blog

Canada Gets It. Why Don’t We?

Posted in politics by roving on January 17, 2009

From Free Republic.

George W. Bush—the Last US President?

Canadian Free Press

By Sher Zieve Wednesday, January 14, 2009
Will George W. Bush end up being the last true US President?  Increasingly, it seems that he just may.  As lawsuits against President-elect Barack Hussein Obama—questioning his US citizenship—continue to grow, he ever more adamantly continues his refusal to produce his real, viable and original birth certificate.  Note:  Obama’s supposed Hawaiian birth certificate is issued to those born outside of the USA who move to Hawaii.  In fact, Hawaii issues “Certifications of Live Birth” to those who are foreign born.  This is the same document that Obama and his team claim is his birth certificate.

Now, another ugly issue is rising within the Obama-minions’ camp.  As I warned you on multiple times prior to the 2008 General Election, “once Obama is elected, we won’t be able to get rid of him.” Tragically, this warning is now being realized.  Not only has Obama established his election-fraud organization—ACORN—nationwide, his adherents have now begun the process to repeal the US Constitution’s 22nd Amendment.  This amendment sets term limits for US presidents.  And Obama still plans to set up his national police force that he wants to be as large and well-funded as the US military.  Note:  Hitler and Stalin used their police forces to crush all of their opposition and Hitler employed his Gestapo to also round up, arrest and exterminate German Jews.  One of today’s current national police forces is called Hezbollah.

So, with election-fraud units firmly in place, no term limits and his personal police to forcibly enforce his will upon the masses, Obama will likely never be voted from the office of POTUS.  Only those who have lost the ability to see and/or hear do not recognize this increasing and eventually ultimate danger.  To add insult to injury, during these current times of economic disaster—brought on by Obama and his Democrat friends—Obama’s inaugural ceremonies are reported and planned to exceed $150M!  And, to top it off, it doesn’t even appear that Obama is a US citizen. Astounding…

————————————————————————————————————-

Today his kingship stopped to give a little speech and to trash the declaration of Independence…again.

“What is required is a new declaration of independence, not just in our nation, but in our own lives – from ideology and small thinking, prejudice and bigotry…” he said

“documents that were imperfect but had within them, like our nation itself, the capacity to be made more perfect. dcexaminer


Advertisements

3 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Sandy@Sandy's said, on January 17, 2009 at 9:34 pm

    Since the Supreme Court granted AMICUS CURIAE , does anyone think the Private meeting with OBAMA and Chief Justice Roberts is related?

    No. 08-570
    ==========================================
    In The
    Supreme Court of the United States
    ——————————— ♦———————————
    PHILIP J. BERG,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    BARACK OBAMA, et al.,
    Respondents.
    ——————————— ♦———————————
    On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari
    Before Judgment To The United States
    Court Of Appeals For The Third Circuit
    ——————————— ♦———————————
    MOTION TO FILE A BRIEF AMICUS CURIAE
    AND MOTION FOR WAIVER OF RULE 37(2)(A)
    OF THIS COURT OF BILL ANDERSON
    AND BRIEF AMICUS CURIAE
    OF BILL ANDERSON AND APPENDIX
    ——————————— ♦———————————
    In Support Of The Petitioner
    LAWRENCE J. JOYCE, ESQ. 1517 N. Wilmot Rd., #215
    Counsel of Record Tucson, AZ 85712
    (520) 584-0236
    barmemberlj@earthlink.net
    =======================================
    MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A BRIEF
    AMICUS CURIAE AND MOTION FOR
    WAIVER OF RULE 37(2)(A) OF THIS COURT
    I. Motion For Leave To File A Brief Amicus
    Curiae
    The Court’s amicus, Bill Anderson, requests leave
    of this Court to file a brief amicus curiae in this case.
    Consent to file it has been obtained from the petitioner,
    whom this brief supports; the respondents
    have not granted consent.
    The amicus is a citizen of the State of Arizona
    and an elector of that state for elector for President of
    the United States. He voted in the general election
    held by the State of Arizona on November 4, 2008.
    This Court has in fact recognized that the amicus has
    an interest in this type of case. See United States v.
    Newman, 238 U.S. 537, 547, 35 S.Ct. 881, 883, 59
    L.Ed. 1446, 1450 (1915); and the same holds true for
    the petitioner. Ibid.
    Your amicus submits that it will not be possible
    for this Court to dispose of this case properly without
    considering the following points which either have
    not been brought to the attention of this Court by the
    parties or which have not been adequately discussed:
    1.) This Court is not facing a question of the
    constitutional aspects of standing, but a
    question pertaining to the prudential
    considerations only; and,
    2.) The lack of an adequate remedy following
    the inauguration of Barack Obama,
    2
    and the potential civil and military crises
    which could arise therefrom, crises
    that could not be readily addressed by
    the ordinary processes of the law, must
    be considered in addressing the prudential
    aspects of standing; and,
    3.) With respect to the prudential considerations
    of standing, certain aspects of
    this case are analogous to the doctrine of
    res ipsa loquitur.

  2. Ted said, on January 18, 2009 at 2:26 pm

    The question is not IF there will be an interdiction of Obama’s Presidency by the Supreme Court, the questions are WHEN and HOW that interdiction will transpire — that is, if the USA is to continue as the Constitutional Republic that now exists.

  3. The Intellectual Redneck said, on January 19, 2009 at 5:39 am

    ConstitutionWatch.org has been on the sidelines during the discussion of Barack Obama’s status as a natural born citizen. Just before his inauguration-they have jumped into the battle with both feet.

    ConstitutionWatch.org jumps into the Obama birth certificate fray


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: